![]() ![]() Blunt force will not set off a nuclear weapon either, no matter how hard. In fact, partial detonation of the explosives will disable the nuclear weapon (but probably contaminate the area with radiation). High precision engineering is required to get everything to come together properly if things are off by even milliseconds, the yield will be dramatically reduced and it may fizzle entirely. The explosives are directed inward in order to generate the necessary chain reaction. note The standard setup for a nuclear bomb is a sphere of weapons grade fissile material surrounded by conventional explosives. Shooting, or even blowing up a real-life nuclear weapon with conventional explosives is likely to disable the warhead, not set it off. to achieve a full-scale explosion (mainly a sphere of conventional explosives being set off in unison around the nuclear mass, compressing it to supercriticality and initiating a nuclear reaction) while fictional nukes act like spheres filled with mega-nitroglycerin. In real life, a nuclear weapon requires precise conditions note The precise engineering of a nuclear weapon makes the best Swiss watch look like a flint knife in comparison.It doesn't matter if it's designed not to do that, it doesn't matter if it's not fissile enough to be used for an atomic bomb, it doesn't matter if it hasn't got enough material for critical mass, it's gonna blow. Related to Reliably Unreliable Guns and Stuff Blowing Up, if something is nuclear, and something, anything happens to it, it's Going Critical and gonna blow up like an atomic bomb. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |